The Winners & Losers of Christmas Retail

Posted on 20 January 2026

There was a time when the festive trading period carried a near-mythical halo for the UK high street. The final quarter of the year could comfortably transform a bad year into a respectable one, but while there have been a number of notable successes for some, the ongoing squeeze in the average person’s purse means we could well be seeing some tectonic shifts in the patterns of Christmas spending.

We take a look at how the festive season shaped up, who came into the New Year with a spring in their step, and which of those have been dragging their heels into 2026.


In 2025, the story has been one of cautious spending. Value retailers won out, and the real fight wasn’t for footfall on the high street. Moreover, the battleground became about fulfilment cut-offs, last-minute delivery capacity and online eyeball conversions.

Various sources of December data showed that consumers hung on as late as possible for last-minute bargains, hoping retailers would blink first and bring forward discounts and sales that might traditionally have run post-Christmas, a pattern that’s now become a more common theme in recent years.

The British Retail Consortium labelled it a “drab Christmas” in their annual roundup of the performance of its industry. Non-food sales were, on the whole, the most underwhelming. With the cost of living continuing to bite and the pace of desired wage growth slowing, even some higher-earning consumers were clearly taking more pragmatic views of the frivolities of festive spending.

But let’s not be entirely doom and gloom here. There were signs that, far from vanishing, it was a case of spending simply migrating elsewhere. So who were the big winners?


Food emerged as the season’s safe haven in otherwise choppy waters. Groceries at this time of year can be both essential and celebratory, and there’s something warm and nostalgic about seeing M&S, the ‘treat’ store of choice for millions of Brits at Christmas time, perform strongly in its food department. Premium Christmas puddings, fizz and speciality party food did the heavy lifting here, proving that consumers still find a few extra pounds to put something special on the table for Christmas lunch.

Online grocery, perhaps unsurprisingly, also grew. Ocado and other digital-first grocers benefited from predictable mission-based shopping habits, with the prestige deliverer reporting some 270 automated picks per minute during its Christmas peak. While many in charge of the ‘big shop’ for Christmas get the heebie jeebies of leaving that to chance with online delivery, convenience and certainty mattered just as much as price.


It seems it was a case of the ‘squeezed middle’, because at the other end, to posh puds from M&S, the known trend towards value intensified. Consumers didn’t stop buying; they simply bought more selectively and more often from value channels.

Discounters, outlet centres, and budget fashion picked up the volume where others, which we’ll touch on shortly, failed to gain traction. The equation seems simple: reasonable quality + predictably low pricing = no emotional angst at the till. In a season where caution ruled, the path of least financial resistance won. Both Lidl and Aldi reported their ‘best ever’ Christmases.


Next, forever a leading bellwether high street brand for the fashion industry, was one of the few clothing and homeware retailers who could hold their head high over Christmas. Improved operational efficiency led to upgraded profit predictions in the city.

Analysts were short on any intangible ‘festive magic’ behind their predictions too, so bosses there will have been enormously buoyed by the signals pointing to operational brilliance: ruthless stock discipline, intelligent promotional calendars, and a digital estate that converts eyeballs deftly and swiftly to the ‘buy now’ button.

In clothing and home, Next’s model proved that you can win share in a flat market through precision rather than discounting or marketing theatrics.


Outside groceries, specialist e-commerce retailers, ranging from beauty and specialist hobby interests to direct-to-consumer niches, found encouraging pockets of growth. They benefited from ever-improving audience understanding and segmentation, repeat-buyer dynamics, and customer acquisition strategies that no longer depend on dangerous overspending in paid social.

Those with strong email/CRM engines and subscription elements fared particularly well…and we still await official figures from the great unknown of TikTok Shop, which most analysts expect to have enjoyed a transformational period. 


Sadly, where there’s a winner, there must be a loser, and for all the reasons those above had a great Christmas, others who failed to get to grips with detailed offerings, clear messaging and operational excellence were looking forlornly at the piles of proverbial unsold novelty socks in the first week of January. 


Generally, the retail industry, outside of value and premium food, found itself squeezed. While Next, who performed particularly strongly internationally, bucked the trend, high street rivals like River Island went into the all-important golden quarter in a particularly gloomy mood, with reports of £64m losses. It was a bleak year for the fashion retailer, who admit they now have a new focus on their online offering. 

Mid-market fashion and homeware felt the pinch of delayed purchasing and reduced baskets when it came to Christmas gifting. Shoppers who might have bought more than a couple of items for a loved one definitely bought fewer.

In a seasonal economy that relies on impulse, gifting and emotionally charged purchases, cautious spending has been the industry’s kryptonite. Do we really have to wonder why the decorations and statement Christmas adverts seem to be unveiled earlier and earlier?


While some department stores had moments of traffic, both online and on the street, they struggled to convert that into all-important spending. Further proof, perhaps, that many are using traditional bricks-and-mortar retailers as the proverbial shop window as a research tool to then go buy better or cheaper online.

These retailers face a double-edged sword. We’ve already seen that discretionary spending is on the wane; consumers are now far clearer on what they want and when.

Equally, demand and ongoing cost pressures across staffing and logistics and in the high cost of maintaining its estate mean margins are squeezed ever further. Christmas 2025 made it clear that without a distinct value proposition, whether that be price, brand curation or unbeatable fulfilment in the shape of rapid, clear delivery processes, shoppers will continue to default to more specialised channels.


It’s the stark, simple and unglamorous truth of modern retail: if you can’t deliver, you don’t convert. Success stories of those without any sort of delivery offering, like Primark, are few and far between. Maybe the warning signs are starting to flicker for the original champions of disposable fashion, reporting a 2.7% like-for-like fall over Christmas.

Several retailers lost customers not through pricing errors, but through delivery anxiety. Unclear final order dates, delayed communications, perceived courier risk and returns friction, a consistent thorn in the side of numerous retailers, especially in fashion, all contributed to failed baskets.

Christmas 2025 didn’t break retail but peeled back the wrapper on where its future strengths should lie. Consumers will continue to spend meaningfully, but they will earnestly interrogate price, value and the ability to receive their goods on their own doorstep in a swift, efficient and safe manner.

Was this the season that finally buried the old assumption that December could rescue the year? The future belongs to retailers who show respect for the customer’s intelligence and truly earn their loyalty. For brands and operators, the message is clear: build for agility, deliver relentlessly, and let value do the talking.